Analyzing the Practicality of the School Capacity Building Training Module to Foster a Child-Friendly School Climate in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30997/jtdik.v12i2.21807Keywords:
School Capacity Building, Child-Friendly School Climate, Teaching Modules, Practicality, elementary schoolAbstract
This study aims to analyze the practicality of the School Capacity Building training module (SCB-ISRA), which was designed to support the creation of a child-friendly school climate at the elementary level. The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model through a sequential exploratory design. A limited trial was conducted at a private elementary school in Bogor Regency involving the principal, 29 teachers, 25 students, and five external stakeholders. Data were collected using a practicality assessment instrument covering aspects of attractiveness, readability, ease of use, and usefulness, and were analyzed through descriptive statistics using the Weighted Mean Score (WMS). The findings revealed that the SCB-ISRA module received average scores of 4.26 from teachers, 4.17 from students, and 4.57 from stakeholders, all of which fall within the categories of practical to highly practical. These results indicate that the module is not only feasible for use but also relevant to the real needs of elementary schools.
References
Alfina, A., & Anwar, R. N. (2020). Child-Friendly School Management for Inclusive Early Childhood Education.Al-Tanzim: Journal of Islamic Educational Management, 4(1), 36-47.
Apriadi, A., & Khadafie, M. (2020). The role of educational institutions in preventing and addressing acts of violence against students.IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA: Journal of Social and Humanities, 4(3), 1-10.
Bryk, A. S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement. The Phi delta coat, 91(7), 23-30.
Crooks, C. V., Jaffe, P., Dunlop, C., Kerry, A., & Exner-Cortens, D. (2019). Preventing gender-based violence among adolescents and young adults: Lessons from 25 years of program development and evaluation. Violence against women, 25(1), 29-55.
Flood, M. (2020). Engaging men and boys in violence prevention. In Men, masculinities and intimate partner violence (pp. 155-169). Routledge.
Fry, D., Fang, X., Elliott, S., Casey, T., Zheng, X., Li, J., ... & McCluskey, G. (2018). The relationships between violence in childhood and educational outcomes: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Child abuse & neglect, 75, 6-28.
Grier, R. A., Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Peres, S. C. (2013, September). The system usability scale: Beyond standard usability testing. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 187-191). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Irawan, H., Rahmawati, M. R., Devani, B. A. K. A., & Zulfahmi, M. N. (2025). Implementation of Child-Friendly Schools in Instilling Effective Communication between Students and Teachers in Elementary Schools.World Inspiration: Journal of Education and Language Research, 4(1), 189-195.
Kholik, A., & Laeli, S. (2020). Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Nature Schools Based on the Resource-Based View Model.Muwahhid administration, 4(1), 73-97.
Kinasih, A. P. P. S., Hakim, M. A. R., Anggraini, N. P., & Sain, Z. H. (2024). Building Inclusive Education: Models and Supporting Factors in Elementary Schools. EDUCARE: Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 123-140.
Liestyasari, S. I., Karsidi, R., & Rahman, A. (2023).Children Right's Analysis of the Implementation of Child-Friendly Schools in Surakarta. KnE Social Sciences, 98-108.
Magfirah, U., & Rachmawati, M. A. (2010). The relationship between school climate and the tendency towards bullying behavior.Journal of the Islamic University of Indonesia, 1-10.
Majdi, M., & Ichsan, A. S. (2021). Child-Friendly Schools for Children's Socio-Emotional Development at Ngupasan State Elementary School, Yogyakarta.Pepatudzu: Educational And Social Media Community,17(1), 1-18.
Martodiryo, S., & Rahmatullah, M. (2022). The Evaluation of Children Friendly School's Programs towards Banjarmasin as a Children Friendly City. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(3), 1706-1714.
Morgan, P. (2006). The concept of capacity. European Centre for Development Policy Management, 1(19), 826-840.
Mustafa, N., Nordin, N. M., Embi, M. A., & Norman, M. H. (2018). Testing the Usability of a Mobile Learning Module. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.21), 113-117.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125-135). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Nuraeni, L., Andrisyah, A., & Nurunnisa, R. (2019). The effectiveness of child-friendly school programs in improving the character of early childhood.Obsession Journal: Journal of Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 20-29.
Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (2011). Promoting relationships and eliminating violence in Canada. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 389-397.
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research Part B: Illustrative cases. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development: SLO.
Qonita, Q., Mulyana, E. H., Loita, A., & Aprily, N. M. (2022). Development of Science Didactic Book for Early Childhood Science Learning.Obsession Journal: Journal of Early Childhood Education, 6(6), 6348-6359.
Reeves, T., & McKenney, S. (2012). 7 things you should know about educational design research. Educause 7 Things Series.
Riduwan. (2009). Measurement Scale of Research Variables.Bandung: ALFABETA.
Sakinah, K., & Ageela, F. (2024). Feasibility Study of Implementing the Child-Friendly School Program to Improve the Quality of Basic Education.Journal of Management and Education | E-ISSN: 3062-7788, 1(3), 43-48.
Satori, D. A., Meirawan, D., & Komariah, A. (2013). School management capacity building model to improve the quality of education.Journal of Educational Administration, 10(1).
Subekti, S., Muktiarni, M., Rahayu, S., & Ismail, A. (2024). Usability Testing of Digital Flip Viewer Using Online Flipbooks.
Tahir, M., & Abunawas, A. (2024). Socialization and education on preventing sexual violence in the school environment.Journal of Community Development, 4(3), 316-321.
Utami, A. N. (2019). Identification of Factors Causing Violence in Educational Institutions. BASIC EDUCATION, 8(8), 795-801.
Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., & McKenney, S. (2006). Introducing educational design research. In Educational design research (pp. 15-19). Routledge.
Widiyanti, I., Taufiqulloh, T., & Apriyani, D. (2022, August). Child-friendly school assessment of infrastructure standards for junior high school. In MALAPY 2022: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, MALAPY 2022, 28 May 2022, Tegal, Indonesia (Vol. 1). European Alliance for Innovation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Kholik, Suharsiwi, Agus Suradika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


