Evaluation of Superovulation Results on in Vivo Embryo Production in Three Different Cows Breeds at The Livestock Embryo Center

Authors

  • Rismasari Perjuangan University of Tasikmalaya
  • Dwi Wijayanti Perjuangan University of Tasikmalaya
  • Fahrudin Darlian Cipelang Livestock Embryo Center, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Putri Indah Ningtias Cipelang Livestock Embryo Center, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Andri Kusmayadi Perjuangan University of Tasikmalaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jpn.v12i1.18415

Keywords:

Angus, FH, OC, Embryo, Superovulation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the superovulation response in several breeds, namely Angus, Friesian Holstein (FH), and Ongole crossbreed (OC). A total of 152 cows were used in this study, namely 39 Angus cows, 62 Friesian Holstein cows, and 51 Ongole crossbreed cows. The parameters of this study were the number of CL, response rate, recovery rate, number of embryos collected (1, 2, 3, 4 (DG/UFO)), proportion of transferable embryos, proportion of DG, and proportion of UFO. The collected data were tested using the Kruskall-Wallis test, if there was a difference, it was continued using the Mann-Whitney test. The results of this study included the number of CL, recovery rate, total embryos collected, proportion of DG, and proportion of UFO of Angus, FH, and OC cows showed significantly different results (P <0.05), the response rate showed very significantly different results (P <0.01), but the proportion of transferable embryos was not significantly different (P > 0.05). This study concludes that CO cattle have the highest average of CL, response rate, recovery rate, and total embryos collected. Meanwhile, Angus cattle produce the lowest percentage of DG and UFO embryos

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin B., Achsani NA., Martianto D., Sari LK., Firdaus AH. 2019. The Future of Indonesian Food Consumption. Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia. 8(1): 71–102.

Bezdícek J., Nesvadbová A., Makarevich A., Kubovičová E. 2020. Relationship between the animal body condition and reproduction: The biotechnological aspects. Archives Animal Breeding. 63(1): 203–209.

Bó GA., Mapletoft RJ. 2020. Superstimulation of ovarian follicles in cattle: Gonadotropin treatment protocols and FSH profiles. Theriogenology. 150(10): 353–359.

Brameld JM., Parr T. 2016. Improving efficiency in meat production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 75(3): 242–246.

Damaris C., Rosmayanti A., Darojah S., Isnaini N. 2023. Capability of Different Breeds of Donor Cattle To Produce Embryos At the Cipelang Livestock Embryo Center, Bogor, West Java. Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan - Indonesian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 17(1): 1–9.

Darlian F., Wahjuningsih S., Rosmayanti A., Jodiansyah S., Jalaludin LA., Setiawan Y., Susilawati T. 2021. Respon Superovulasi Sapi Persilangan Belgian Blue dengan Metode yang Berbeda. Jurnal Agripet. 21(2): 178–186.

Degefa T., Lemma A., Tegegne A., Youngs C. 2016. Superovulation of Boran Cattle in Ethiopia: A Preliminary Report. 1–2.

Fontes PLP., Oosthuizen N., Ciriaco FM., Sanford CD., Canal LB., Pohler KG., Henry DD., Mercadante VRG., Timlin CL., Ealy AD., Johnson SE., Dilorenzo N., Lamb GC. 2019. Impact of fetal vs. maternal contributions of Bos indicus and Bos taurus genetics on embryonic and fetal development. Journal of Animal Science. 97(4): 1645–1655.

Godfray HCJ., Aveyard P., Garnett T., Hall JW., Key TJ., Lorimer J., Pierrehumbert RT., Scarborough P., Springmann M., Jebb SA. 2018. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science (New York, N.Y.). 361(6399).

González FV., De La Torre Sánchez JF., Velázquez GM., Gallardo HÁ., Reynozo SP., Fránquez JAP., Sojo RP., Bermúdez MM. 2017. Caracterización de la respuesta ovárica a la superovulación en bovino Criollo Coreño utilizando dosis reducidas de FSH. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias. 8(3): 225–232.

Horn EJ., Read CC., Edwards JL., Schrick FN., Rhinehart JD., Payton RR., Campagna SR., Klabnik JL., Clark HM., Myer PR., Mclean KJ., Moorey SE. 2022. Preovulatory follicular fluid and serum metabolome profiles in lactating beef cows with thin, moderate, and obese body condition. Journal of Animal Science. 100(7): 1–14.

Jaton C., Koeck A., Sargolzaei M., Malchiodi F., Price CA., Schenkel FS., Miglior F. 2016. Genetic analysis of superovulatory response of Holstein cows in Canada. Journal of Dairy Science. 99(5): 3612–3623.

Kamath MS., Mascarenhas M., Kirubakaran R., & Bhattacharya S. 2020. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020(8).

Kasimanickam R., Kasimanickam V., Kastelic JP., Ramsey K. 2020. Metabolic biomarkers, body condition, uterine inflammation and response to superovulation in lactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology. 146: 71–79.

Köse AM., Çizmeci SÜ., Dinç DA. 2022. Embryo Transfer in Fleckvieh Simmental Cows: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Veterinary Science. 11(2): 196–200.

Kruse SG., Bridges GA., Funnell BJ., Bird SL., Lake SL., Arias RP., Amundson OL., Larimore EL., Keisler DH., Perry GA. 2017. Influence of post-insemination nutrition on embryonic development in beef heifers. Theriogenology. 90: 185–190.

Maqhashu A., Mphaphathi ML., Sebei PJ., Muchenje V., Nedambale TL. 2021. Superovulation Response and Embryo Quality Recovered Following Flushing Nguni Heifers and Cows. 16(4): 272 - 277

Mondragón V., Galina CS., Rubio I., Corro M., Salmerón F. 2016. Effect of restricted suckling on the onset of follicular dynamics and body condition score in Brahman cattle raised under tropical conditions. Animal Reproduction Science. 167: 89–95.

Naranjo-Chacón F., Montiel-Palacios F., Canseco-Sedano R., Ahuja-Aguirre C. 2019. Embryo production in middle-aged and mature Bos taurus × Bos indicus cows induced to multiple ovulation in a tropical environment. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 51(8): 2641–2644.

Parker Gaddis KL., Dikmen S., Null DJ., Cole JB., Hansen PJ. 2017. Evaluation of genetic components in traits related to superovulation, in vitro fertilization, and embryo transfer in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(4): 2877–2891.

Peralta-Torres JA., Aké-López JR., Segura-Correa JC., Aké-Villanueva JR. 2017. Effect of season on follicular population, quality and nuclear maturation of bovine oocytes under tropical conditions. Animal Reproduction Science. 187(10): 47–53.

Redhead AK., Siew N., Lambie N., Carnarvon D., Ramgattie R., Knights M. 2018. The relationship between circulating concentration of AMH and LH content in the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) preparations on follicular growth and ovulatory response to superovulation in water buffaloes. Animal Reproduction Science. 188(11): 66–73.

Sartori R., Gimenes LU., Monteiro PLJ., Melo LF., Baruselli PS., Bastos MR. 2016. Metabolic and endocrine differences between Bos taurus and Bos indicus females that impact the interaction of nutrition with reproduction. Theriogenology. 86(1): 32–40.

Sartori R., Monteiro PLJ., Wiltbank MC. 2016. Endocrine and metabolic differences between Bos taurus and Bos indicus cows and implications for reproductive management. Animal Reproduction. 13(3): 168–181.

Smuts MP., de Bruyn S., Thompson PN., Holm DE. 2019. Serum albumin concentration of donor cows as an indicator of developmental competence of oocytes. Theriogenology. 125: 184–192.

Tadesse B., Reda AA., Kassaw NT., Tadeg W. 2022. Success rate of artificial insemination, reproductive performance and economic impact of failure of first service insemination: a retrospective study. BMC Veterinary Research. 18(1): 1–10.

Wijayanti D., Zhang S., Yang Y., Bai Y., Akhatayeva Z., Pan C., Zhu H., Qu L., Lan X. 2022. Goat SMAD family member 1 (SMAD1): mRNA expression, genetic variants, and their associations with litter size. Theriogenology. 193: 11–19.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

Rismasari, Dwi Wijayanti, Fahrudin Darlian, Putri Indah Ningtias, & Andri Kusmayadi. (2026). Evaluation of Superovulation Results on in Vivo Embryo Production in Three Different Cows Breeds at The Livestock Embryo Center. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30997/jpn.v12i1.18415

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Wijayanti, Rismasari Sari, Fahrudin Darlian, Putri Indah Ningtias, Andri Kusmayadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara. 
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.