Phonetic Analysis of Makhārij al-Ḥurūf Pronunciation Errors in the Recitation of Surah Al-Fātiḥah by Grade VIII Students at SMPIT Nurul Yaqien

English

Authors

  • alfin maulana haryadi UIN SUNAN GUNUNG DJATI
  • Lina Marlina UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/tjpba.v6i2.20429

Keywords:

Phonetics, Makharij Al-Huruf, Surah Al-Fātiḥah, Tajweed, Pronunciation Mistakes

Abstract

This study aims to analyze phonetic errors in makharij al-ḥurūf (the articulation points of Arabic letters) in the recitation of Surah Al-Fātiḥah by 8th-grade students of SMPIT Nurul Yaqien. The method used is descriptive qualitative, involving direct observation and in-depth interviews with tahsin teachers and selected students. The results show that the most frequent pronunciation errors occurred in the letters Ḍād (ض), Ṣād (ص), Ghain (غ), Ḥā’ (ح), and ‘Ain (ع), which have no direct equivalents in Indonesian phonology. Contributing factors include limited theoretical understanding of makhraj, lack of articulation practice, and teaching methods that do not incorporate phonetic-based approaches. The findings highlight the need for phonetic and visual strategies in teaching tajweed to improve mastery of makharij al-ḥurūf. Theoretically, this study contributes to Arabic linguistic research by identifying phonetic error patterns among non-native speakers. Practically, it serves as a foundation for developing more effective phonetic-articulatory based tajweed instruction methods in Islamic educational institutions.

References

Albantani, A. M. (2019). Pendekatan Fonetik, Kontrastif, dan Komunikatif dalam Pengajaran Membaca Alquran. Arabic Literature for Academic Zealots, 7(02), 107–117.

Dila, M. R. (2023). Kesalahan Pengucapan Bunyi oleh Siswa dalam Membaca Al-qur’an di MTs Bima NTB (Kajian Fonologis). JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(9), 7311–7321.

Gazali, H. A., & Auliya, S. (2020). The role of makharij al-huruf in keeping the meaning of the qur’an verses. Al FAWATIH: Jurnal Kajian Al Quran dan Hadis, 1(1), 92–108.

Hasibuan, J. I. (2022). Implications of Makharij al-Huruf Learning in Improving The Rote Cauldron of The Qur'an Learners. Ruhama: Islamic Education Journal, 5(1), 27–36.

Nasution, A. S. A. (2022). Fonetik dan Fonologi Alquran. Amzah.

Sholihin, M. N. (2020). Peran Ilmu Al-Ashwat dalam Pelafalan Huruf Hijaiyah (Kajian Teoritik Linguistik Terapan). SALIHA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 110–127.

Ulum, M. B. (2024). Phonological Classification of Arabic Based on Articulatory Similarities with Indonesian: A Comparative Linguistic Study. Journal of Arabic Language Studies and Teaching, 4(2), 45–60.

Yusuff, M. S. S., & Abd Halim, W. M. H. W. (2024). Penerokaan Konsonan Huruf al-Quran dalam Surah al-Fatihah. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 6(2), 330–341.

Al-Afghani, M. A. (2016). Ilmu Tajwid: Teori dan Praktik Membaca Al-Qur'an dengan Baik dan Benar. Jakarta: Kencana.

Al-Jarīmi, A. (2010). Ilmu Tajwid: Makharij al-Ḥurūf wa Ṣifātihā. Kairo: Dār al-Maʻārif.

Ar-Rāzī, A. (2011). Makharij al-Ḥurūf: Telaah Fonetik Bunyi Bahasa Arab. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hasan, M. (2018). Fonetik dan Fonologi Bahasa Arab. Malang: UIN-Malang Press.

Hidayat, T. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Pelafalan Huruf Hijaiyah dalam Bacaan Al-Qur’an pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 6(1), 22–33.

Syukri, M. (2020). Kajian Fonetik terhadap Pelafalan Huruf Qalqalah pada Bacaan Al-Qur'an. Al-Murabbi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 115–127.

Rahmawati, D., & Nurbayan, A. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Fonetik dalam Pelafalan Surah Al-Fātiḥah oleh Siswa. Jurnal Al-Bayan: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur'an dan Hadis, 10(1), 35–45.

Syaikh Utsaimin, M. bin Ṣāliḥ. (2002). Tafsīr Surah Al-Fātiḥah. Riyadh: Dar Ibn al-Jauzi.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

How to Cite

haryadi, alfin maulana, & Marlina, L. (2025). Phonetic Analysis of Makhārij al-Ḥurūf Pronunciation Errors in the Recitation of Surah Al-Fātiḥah by Grade VIII Students at SMPIT Nurul Yaqien: English. Tatsqifiy: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 6(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.30997/tjpba.v6i2.20429