The Struggle to Accept Rohingya Refugees in the Perspective of Law and Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v17i1.12689Keywords:
Law and Humans Rights,, Rohingnya Refugees,, StrugglesAbstract
The Indonesian people believe that protecting human rights is necessary for ethnic Rohingya seeking asylum in Indonesia, as part of their commitment to being a country that upholds the spirit of the constitution. Indonesia has sovereignty and has not ratified the 1951 Convention or the 1967 Protocol, but it is still subject to general international law standards that are accepted and recognized internationally. Indonesia has an international obligation to comply with the provisions of the convention and protocol, despite the fact that it has not ratified them. It should be noted that norms that have not been ratified into national law do not have absolute legal force, which means that international legal norms can be violated as long as national interest does not require it. The research employs normative legal research methods. This study delves deeper into the protection of Rohingya refugees' human rights as a humanitarian response with implications for societal injustice. This can be seen in the absence of obligations as the fulfillment of rights carried out by Rohingya refugees receiving benefits without burden, or Rohingya refugees taking in greater benefits from the Indonesian people without burden. Furthermore, there are implications for the destruction of the socio-cultural order in the form of inherited knowledge, norms, regulations, and skills among Indonesians. This can be seen in the behavior and actions of Rohingya refugees who do not maintain cleanliness, do not adhere to Islamic law and customs within the community, do not follow local norms and customs, and commit criminal acts of rape on minors.
Downloads
References
Afriandi, F., and Nizmi, Y. E. (2014). Kepentingan indonesia belum meratifikasi konvensi 1951 dan protokol 1967 mengenai pengungsi internasional dan pencari suaka. Transnasional: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Universitas Riau, 5(2),1-13.
Alamsyah, W. (2004). Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manuasia Dalam Penangkapan dan Penahanan Dalam Proses Penyidikan. Disertasi, Makasar, Program Pascasarjana, Unhas.
Andistan, M. A. A. P., and Zulfikar, A. (2018). Indonesian government challenges in ratification of the international convention on refugees. The Journal of Islamic Studies and International Relations, 3(1), 31-44.
Arianta, K., Mangku, D. G. S., and Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Perlindungan hukum bagi kaum etnis rohingya dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 3(2), 166-176.
Asrieyani, D. (2013). Peran office of the high commissioner for human right dalam penyelesaian kasus genosida etnis rohingya di myanmar (1978-2012). Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 1(2), 50.
Dirdjosisworo, S. (2002). Pengadilan hak asasi manusia Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Fattah, V. (2017). Hak asasi manusia sebagai jus cogens dan kaitannya dengan hak atas pendidikan. Yuridika, 32(2), 352.
G.W Paton, (1972). Textbook of of jurisprudence, English language book Society, Oxford University Press, London.
Hadjon, P. M., & Djatmiati, T. S. (2016). Argumen Hukum, Surabaya.
Hidayati, D. (2017). Memudarnya nilai kearifan lokal masyarakat dalam pengelolaan sumber daya air. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 11(1), 39-48.
Ibrahim, J. (2010). Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, cet ke-3. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Jhon p humphrey, magna charta umat manusia, peter davies, HAM, terjemahan, jakarta, yayasan oboe indonesia, 1994.
Kriegel, B. (1995). The state and the rule of law. Kriegel, B. (1995). The state and the rule of law.
Luhukay, R. S. (2021). Refleksi ATAS perlindungan hak asasi manusia DI provinsi papua. Pro patria: Jurnal Pendidikan, Kewarganegaraan, Hukum, Sosial, dan Politik, 4(2), 213-231.
Mahmud, P. M. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada.
Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian hukum: Edisi revisi. Prenada Media.
Moh.Koesnoe, (1997). Nilai nilai dasar tata hukum dan identitas nasional, Yogyakarta, Fakultah Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Raustiala, K. (2002). The architecture of international cooperation: Transgovernmental networks and the future of international law. Va. J. Int'l L., 43, 1.
Riyanto, S. (2012). Kedaulatan negara dalam kerangka hukum internasional kontemporer. Yustisia, 1(3).
Robertua, V. (2015). Globalisasi dan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM): studi kasus pelanggaran HAM di Myanmar. Sociae Polites, 16(1), 1-16.
Salim, H. S. (2013). Penerapan teori hukum pada penelitian tesis dan disertasi.John Rawls, A Theory of Justice – Teori Keadilan (Terj. Uzair Fausan), Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2006.
Sefriani, S. (2011). Ketaatan masyarakat internasional terhadap hukum internasional dalam perspekti filsafat hukum. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UII, 18(3), 405-427.
Setiawan, A. Y. (2018). Nilai-nilai interaksi budaya masyarakat sekitar bumi alit batukarut kabupaten bandung. GEOAREA| Jurnal Geografi, 1(1), 8-14.
Setiyono, J. (2022). Kontribusi UNHCR dalam penanganan pengungsi internasional di Indonesia.
Shaw, M. N. (2017). International law. Cambridge university press.
Sukirno, S. (2004). Makroekonomi teori pengantar.
Sultoni, Y. (2014). Alasan indonesia belum meratifikasi konvensi 1951 tentang pengungsi dan perlindungan hukum bagi pengungsi di indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Brawijaya University).
Tieken, S. (2013). Ketiadaan kewarganegaraan pada anak-anak rohingya sebagai bentuk kekerasan struktural berbasis etnis (Studi kasus anak-anak pengungsi rohingya di community housing wisma YPAP Medan). Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 9(1), 51-65.
Van Apeldoorn, L. J. (2001). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, diterjemahkan oleh Oetarid Sadino. Jakarta, Pradnya Paramitha.
Wilamarta, M. (2002). Hak pemegang saham minoritas dalam rangka good corporate governance. Jakarta: FH Ul.
Yani, Bandung, (2017). Pengantar Ilmu. Hubungan Internasional, PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
