Trademark Infringement in the Advertising of Dupe Perfumes under Indonesian Trademark Law

Authors

  • Ajeng Nadya Berlianty Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v12i1.22103

Keywords:

Iklan, Parfum Dupe, Pelanggaran Merek

Abstract

Dupe perfumes are the result of chemical engineering technology that produces scents resembling those of well-known branded perfumes. Their marketing strategy, through comparative advertising, often prominently features famous perfume trademarks in order to capitalize on their reputation and brand image. This phenomenon raises legal issues, as the unauthorized use of well-known trademarks has the potential to infringe upon the exclusive rights of registered trademark owners as regulated under Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This study aims to analyze the forms of trademark infringement in the phenomenon of comparative advertising of dupe perfumes that unlawfully incorporates well-known trademarks under Indonesian trademark law. The research method employed is normative juridical, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Data were obtained through library research, including legislation, legal literature, and relevant doctrines. The results of the study indicate that the inclusion of well-known trademarks in dupe perfume advertisements without authorization can be qualified as trademark infringement, as it fulfills the elements set forth in Article 83 of Law Number 20 of 2016, namely the existence of a registered trademark owner or licensee, the use of the trademark by another party without rights, similarity in its essential elements or in its entirety, and its use for similar goods or services.

References

Jurnal

Austin, Graeme W., “Tolerating Confusion about Confusion: Trademark Policies and Fair Use,” Arizona Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1(2008).

Bafadhal, Thoyyibah, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia: Kasus IKEA,” Undang: Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2018).

Basu, Anuradha, “The Smell of Protection: The Scope of Intellectual Property Rights in Perfume (Fragrance),” International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2020.

Clay, Marra M., “Copycat Cosmetics: The Beauty Industry and the Bounds of the American Intellectual Property System,” Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 106, (2021).

Dunn, Nicole, “A Dupe or Just Duped?: An Analysis of the History and Policy Behind Counterfeit Cosmetics and Social Media's Role in Perpetuating its Sales”, Journal of Health & Biomedical Law, XX (2024): 92-118.

Dornis Tim W. dan Thomas Wein, “Trademarks, Comparative Advertising, and Product Imitations: An Untold Story of Law and Economics,” Penn State Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, (2016).

Ertekin, Larisa, Alina Sorescu, dan Mark B. Houston, “Hands off my Brand! The Financial Consequences of Protecting Brands through Trademark Infringement Lawsuits,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 82, No. 5, September, 2018.

Marsoof, Althaf, “Keywords Advertising: Issues of Trademark Infringement”, Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology Vol. 5, Issue 4 (2010).

Putri, Yunita Maya. 2021. “Perlindungan Bagi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal”. DE’RECHTSSTAAT 7 (2):173-84. https://ojs.unida.info/index.php/LAW/article/view/4073.

Rosenburg, Sarah, “Unenforceable ‘Infringement’: The Benefits of Makeup Dupes and Legal Copying”, Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, (2025): hlm. 316-339.

Saunders Kurt M., "Confusion is the Key: A Trademark Law Analysis of Keyword Banner Advertising," Fordham Law Review 71, no. 2 (November 2002): 543-578.

Sidbury, Benjamin F., “Comparative Advertising on the Internet: Defining the Boundaries of Trademark Fair Use for Internet Metags and Trigger Ads,” North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2001).

Sipe, Matthew G., “A Fragility Theory of Trademark Functionality”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 169, No. 6, (Juni 2021).

Buku

Mayana, Ranti Fauza dan Tisni Santika, Hukum Merek Perkembangan Aktual Pelindungan Merek dalam Konteks Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Disrupsi Digital, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama (2021).

Noerhadi, Cita Citrawinda, Perlindungan Merek Terkenal & Konsep Dilusi Merek dari Perspektif Global, Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2020.

Permata, Rika Ratna, Tasya Safiranita Ramli, dan Biondy Utama, Pelanggaran Merek di Indonesia, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2021.

Internet

Heriani, Fitri Novia, Hukum Online, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/begini-cara-menentukan-klasifikasi-barang-jasa-di-pendaftaran-merek. (diakses tanggal 25 Agustus 2025).

Tampubolon, John, “Memahami ‘Dupe’ dalam Ekosistem Wangi: Inspirasi dan Plagiarisme - Di Mana Batasnya?,” https://www.beautyjournal.id/article/memahami-dupe-dalam-ekosistem-wangi-inspirasi-dan-plagiarisme-di-mana-batasnya, diakses 23 Februari 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-21

How to Cite

Ajeng Nadya Berlianty. (2026). Trademark Infringement in the Advertising of Dupe Perfumes under Indonesian Trademark Law. DE’RECHTSSTAAT, 12(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v12i1.22103

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.