The Importance of Customs Harmonization Between Asean Countries to Enhance Regional Trade Flow

Authors

  • Dwi Tiara Kurnilasari Politeknik Negeri Batam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i2.21387

Keywords:

ASEAN, Customs Harmonization, Economic Integration, Trade Facilitation

Abstract

This article explores the critical role of customs harmonization in advancing regional economic integration within the ASEAN framework. Despite significant progress in tariff liberalization, ASEAN continues to face operational and legal fragmentation in customs administration, which undermines intra-regional trade and supply chain efficiency. Through a normative comparative analysis with other regional blocs, such as the European Union, MERCOSUR, and SACU, this study identifies structural gaps, institutional asymmetries, and policy inconsistencies that hinder effective integration. It proposes a multi-dimensional strategy involving modernization, regulatory reform, cross-border cooperation, and legal alignment with international standards such as the Revised Kyoto Convention and WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement. The study emphasizes that harmonized customs procedures reduce transaction costs, improve clearance times, and foster mutual trust and institutional cohesion among member states. It concludes that achieving a fully integrated customs environment is fundamental for ASEAN to transition from a free trade area to a customs union and to ensure the long-term resilience of the ASEAN Economic Community.

References

Legal Documents

Republic of Indonesia, 2006 State Law Number 17 on Customs

Books, Articles, and Working Paper

Abuselidze, George, and Aleko Meladze. “Innovative Customs System and Its Impact on the Sustainability of the Transit Potential.” European Journal of Sustainable Development 13, no. 1 (2024): 229. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n1p229.

Buban, Salvador, Dionisius Narjoko, Rashesh Shrestha, and Doan Thi Thanh Ha, eds. Follow-up ASEAN Seamless Trade Facilitation Indicators. 1st ed. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), 2023. https://www.eria.org/uploads/Follow-up-ASEAN-Seamless-Trade-Facilitation-Indicators-comp.pdf#page=197.

Desierto, Diane A., and David Cohen, eds. ASEAN Law and Regional Integration: Governance and The Rule of Law in Southeast Asia’s Single Market. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315267401.

Ha, Nguyen Nhu, and Dang Minh Phuong. “Trade Facilitation in Asean Through Customs Cooperation - Advancing Towards Sustainable Development Goals 8, 9 and 17.” Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review 5, no. 4 (2025): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n04.pe05642.

Hamdani, Alfarisi. “Harmonisasi Pengaturan Bidang Usaha Penanaman Modal ( UU No . 11 Tahun 2020 Dan Perpres No . 49 Tahun 2021 )”. Jurnal Hukum De' Rechstaat. Vol. 10, no. 11 (2024): 252–62.

Hestermeyer, Holger P. “European Trade.” London, 2020.

Irawan, Candra. “Legal Harmonization in ASEAN Economic Communities (Looking for the Best Legal Harmonization Model).” UBELAJ 3, no. 2 (2018): 134–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251316000229.

Koval, Alexandra Gennadyevna, and Ekaterina Konstantinovna Andrianova. “MERCOSUR in Trade Policy Clusters: Challenges and Prospects.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 42, no. 3 (2022): 718–37. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572022-3288.

Lima, Lis. “Mercosur : A Common Market or an Incomplete Customs Union ?” FLUX: International Relations Review, 2022.

Mery, Lisa, Andi Sri Rezky Wulandari, Patawari, and Nurmiati. “Indonesia ’ S Strategic Role in the Development of.” Tirtayasa Journal of International Law 3, no. 1 (2024): 33–69.

Mufrina and Martin Roestamy. “Analisis Yuridis Hak Menguasai Negara dalam Konteks Pengembangan Industri Kolaka di Sulawesi Tenggara”. Jurnal Hukum De’ Rechtstaat 10, No. 2 (2024): 167 - 178.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Vol. 1. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.

Nikolaevna, Marinich Yana, and Chislova Elizaveta Vadimovna. “Automated Customs Clearance Systems Using the EAEU, EU, ASEAN and MERCOSUR as Examples.” Innovative Technologies in International Trade. Belarus, 2022.

Pramono, Sugiarto. Buku Ajar Studi Rezim Internasional. Wahid Hasyim University Press, 2023.

Safudin, Endrik. Harmonisasi Hukum dalam Antinomi Hukum: Telaah Kritis atas Penerapannya oleh Mahkamah Agung. Deepublish, 2021.

Sandor Gyula Nagy (Ed.). Routledge Advances in Regional Economics, Science, and Policy: The Economics of Regional Integration. Routledge, 2025.

Seehawattana, Acharaporn, Paramaporn Weeraphan, and Damorn Kumtrai. “Bridging the Divide: Legal and Practical Issues in Rail Goods Transit Between Thailand and Laos.” Journal of Ecohumanism 3, no. 8 (2024): 2445–62. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5742.

Sekar,. P.M., et.al. “Analisis Pengenaan Pajak Digital Berdasarkan General Agreement On Trade In Services”. Jurnal Hukum De’ Rechtstaat 20. No. 2 (2024): 179 - 187.

Wagiman and Anasthasya S.M. Terminologi Hukum Internasional: Panduan Lengkap bagi Mahasiswa, Praktisi, dan Penegak Hukum dalam Memahami Peristilahan Hukum Internasional. Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Walsh, Tom. “Putting More Union in European Customs.” World Customs Journal 16, no. 2 (2022): 57–80. https://doi.org/10.55596/001c.116321.Wulf, Luc De, and José B. Sokol, eds. Customs Modernization Handbook. Customs Modernization Handbook. Washington DC: World Bank, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7216.

Internet

“Customs," Cambridge Online Dictionary, accessed March 20, 2025, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/customs.

"ASEAN Economic Community,", ASEAN Secretariat, accessed March 25, 2025, https://asean.org/our-communities/economic-community

“Logistics Performance Indicator Report 2023”, World Bank, Available on website: https://lpi-worldbank-org/international/scorecard/radar/C/IDN/2023?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc, Accessed on April 3rd 2025.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Dwi Tiara Kurnilasari. (2025). The Importance of Customs Harmonization Between Asean Countries to Enhance Regional Trade Flow. DE’RECHTSSTAAT, 11(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i2.21387