Applying of the Concept of the Death Penalty in Indonesia and Malaysia

Authors

  • M Farhas Sahdewa Law Faculty, Universitas Djuanda
  • Henny Nuraeny Law Faculty, Universitas Djuanda
  • Rizal Syamsul Ma'arif Law Faculty, Universitas Djuanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i2.18691

Keywords:

Applying, Criminal Code, Death Penalty, Indonesia, Malaysia

Abstract

The death penalty in the Indonesian Criminal Code is found in Law Number 1 of 1946 (KUHP 1946) and Law Number 1 of 2023 (KUHP 2023). In the 1946 Criminal Code, the legalization of the death penalty is maintained in Article 10 and is positioned as a principal crime, this is different from the 2023 Criminal Code which includes the death penalty in Article 67, then changes the death penalty to a special crime, whereas in Malaysia the legalization of the death penalty is threatened The death penalty in Law 574 is formulated in 2 forms of punishment patterns, namely a single one that places the death penalty as mandatory and alternative. However, in 2023 Malaysia will change the mandatory nature of the death penalty in its state regulations, which are outlined in the Death Penalty Deed 2023 Act 846. In this research the author uses a normative juridical approach, namely a statutory approach; by analyzing the rules and regulations relating to these legal issues. The results of this research are: There are several motives that are most popular in the reasons for using the death penalty in Indonesia, namely that the death penalty has a higher level of effectiveness, has a frightening effect (shock therapy), and is also considered more economical and is used so that no action occurs. the main judge himself (eigenrichting) in society as well and the implementation of the Mandatory Death Law in Malaysia from the perspective of the Common Law System is the same as the hudud law in terms of the same type of jinayah punishment for the convicted perpetrator but is contrary to the hudud punishment in terms of making forgiveness and apology to the Yang diPertuan Agong for violations of hudud, seduction can be carried out if there is ambiguity in the case only.

References

References

Adhigama Andre Budiman, “Fenomena Deret Tunggu Terpidana Mati Di Indonesia” (Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR), 2020)

Adhigama Andre Budiman, “Laporan Situasi Kebijakan Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia 2020: Mencabut Nyawa Di Masa Pandemi,”

Alya Alviani, and Yenny Fitri.Z. 2024. “Legal Regulations on Criminal Acts Against Misuse of AI (Artificial Intelligence) Technology in Voice Phishing Fraud via Mobile Phones”. DE’RECHTSSTAAT 10 (2):207-16. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v10i2.15150.

Asian Human Rights Comission, Defisit Abolisi Hukuman Mati di Indonesia denganTren Global Menuju Penghapusan Hukuman Mati, 2012. https://www.humanrights.asia/news/ahrc-news/AHRC-STM-195-2012-ID/, diakses pada Kamis, 6 Juni 2024 Pukul 21:16 WIB

Chairul Huda, “Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Cetakan Ke 4,” Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2011.

Coulson, The History Of Islamic Law, diterjemahkan oleh Hamid Ahmad, Hukum Islam dalam Perspektif Sejarah, P3M, Jakarta, 2017.

Eva, Jaka, Penghapusan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam, Jurnal Al-Hakim : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah, Hukum, dan Filantropi, 2022.

Hartanto. 2024. “Chemical Castration Against People Sexual Violence against Children”. DE’RECHTSSTAAT 10 (2):240-51. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v10i2.12956.

Hukuman Mati Di Malaysia, 2018, https://ms.wikipedia.org /wiki/ Hukuman_mati_diMalaysia, diakses pada Jumat, 7 Juni 2024 Pukul 12:03 WIB

Ibrahim Abu Bakar, Utusan Online, "Hukuman Mati Tak Wajar Diganti Penjara Seumur Hidup", 2018. http://ww1.utusan.com.my/ utusan/Rencana/20131213/re_06/Hukuman-mati-tak-wajar-diganti-penjara-seumur-hidup diakses pada Jumat, 7 Juni 2024 Pukul 12:05 WIB

Kelly Buchanan, Malaysia: RUU Penghapusan Hukuman Mati Wajib untuk Pelanggaran Tertentu Disahkan, 2023. https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2023-04-13/malaysia-bill-removing-mandatory-death-penalty-for-certain-offenses-passed/, diakses pada Jumat, 7 Juni 2024 Pukul 12:20 WIB

Khairul Tammi, Studi Perbandingan Pidana Mati Dalam Penal Code Negara-Negara Asean (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapura, Vietnam, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Dan Brunei Darussalam), Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Hatta Padang, 2024.

Keisha Anakku Putri Silalahi, Jinner Sidauruk, and Meli Hertati Gultom. 2024. “Criminal Law Perspective on Cyberbullying Phenomenon on Social Media”. DE’RECHTSSTAAT 10 (2):156-66. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v10i2.14831.

Pan Mohamad Faiz, Hukuman Mati dan Hak Untuk Hidup, Jurnal Hukum, Vol.1 Nomor 2 Thn 2018.

Patrick Hudson, “Does the Death Row Phenomenon Violate a Prisoner’s Human Rights under International Law?,” European Journal of International Law 11, no. 4, 2000.

Philip Alston, Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, PUSHAM UII, Yogyakarta, 2018.

Slamet, Problematika Penerapan Pidana Mati Dalam Konteks Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Volume 1, Nomor 2 Juli 2012. Hlm 209

Warih Anjani, Penjatuhan Pidana Mati di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia, Jurnal Widya Yustisia, Vol. 1 No.2 Thn 2020.

Yon Artiono Arba’i, Aku Menolak Hukuman Mati, (Jakarta: KPG(Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia), 2012.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-20

How to Cite

Sahdewa, M. F., Nuraeny, H., & Ma’arif, R. S. (2025). Applying of the Concept of the Death Penalty in Indonesia and Malaysia. DE’RECHTSSTAAT, 11(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i2.18691

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.