Separatist Creditors' Rights In Handling Bankruptcy Assets

Authors

  • Dahris Siregar Universitas Tjut Nyak Dhien

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i1.17098

Keywords:

Bankruptcy Property, Creditors, Debt Settlement, Bankruptcy, Court Decision

Abstract

Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) protects the rights of creditors, particularly separatist creditors. It also regulates the administration and settlement of bankruptcy assets and determines whether or not the administration and settlement of bankruptcy assets has protected separatist creditors. Normative law research is the methodology used in this study. A normative theoretical examination of the principles, rules, and procedures governing Indonesian bankruptcy law is the goal of this research. The findings of the research indicate that creditors can receive a fair distribution of assets when debts are settled through insolvency institutions. Separatist creditors can suffer losses due to not meeting the legal requirements of collateral, especially those contained in Article 59 of Law No. 2004, Paragraph I of Article 55 and Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 56, which regulate the postponement of execution and restrictions on the period of execution of collateral. The curator must provide the list of bankruptcy assets to the court in accordance with Law No. 37 of 2004, especially paragraph 1 of Article 55 given its connection to the Law on Guarantees, backed up by the justifications for requesting the Supervisory Judge's approval or the court designation, which has the ability to protect separatist creditors from their rights guaranteed by the Law.

References

Ahmad Yani, Gunawan Widjaja. Seri Hukum Bisnis : Kepailitan. Cet . 4. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.

Aji Suryanata, Yudho Taruno Muryanto. “Analisis Actio Pauliana Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Kepailitan (Studi Putusan Nomor 06/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-Lain AP/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Nomor 27/Pdt-Sus PKPU/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.).” Aliansi : Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, no. 2 (2024). file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/ALIANSI+VOL+1+NO+2+MARCH+2024+HAL+63-72+(Revisi)-1.pdf.

Fadhli, Muhammad, Arrisman Arrisman, and Rumainur Rumainur. “Kedudukan Dan Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis Terhadap Harta Debitor Pailit Berdasarkan Pasal 55 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 4, no. 4 (2024): 590–600. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2008.

Fuady, Munir. Hukum Jaminan Utang. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2013.

———. Hukum Pailit Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Ke-6. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2017.

Hartini, Rahayu. Hukum Kepailitan. Cetakan : Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2020.

Journal, Diponegoro L A W. “Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Penjamin Perorangan (Personal Guarantee) Pada Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5 (2016): 1–17. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1440388&val=4724&title=ANALISIS YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN PENJAMIN PERORANGAN PERSONAL GUARANTEE PADA KEPAILITAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS.

Kamil, M Ihsan. “Sita Harta Milik Orang Asing Yang Di Atas Namakan Debitor Pailit (Nominee) Oleh Kurator.” UnizarLawRiview 2, no. 1 (2019). file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/116-1-329-1-10-20190702.pdf.

Kartini Muljadi, Gunawan Widjaja. Pedoman Menangani Perkara Kepailitan. Ed. rev.; Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

Makmur, Syarifudin. “Kepastian Hukum Kepailitan Bagi Kreditur Dan Debitur Pada Pengadilan Niaga Di Indonesia.” Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, FAI Universitas Ibn Khaidun (UIKA) Bogor 4, no. 2 (2016): 337–68. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/187-355-1-PB.pdf.

Mardiyati, Siti. “Reformasi Hukum Perdata Dalam Kaitan Dengan Kemudahan Berusaha Dan Hubungan Transnasional.” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 3, no. 1 (2023): 284–93. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2700/9ff818d0f18da9a695ec69414c371d69f2ff.pdf.

Margono, Suyud. “Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Kurator Terhadap Pelanggaran Dalam Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit.” Law Faculty of MPU Tantular University 4, no. 1 (2021): 1–23. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/VOL+5++NO+1+2021+KE+1.pdf.

Mulkan, Hasanal, and Serlika Aprita. “Pertangungjawaban Pidana Kurator Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Prinsip Independensi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004.” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 7, no. 1 (2023): 264–76. https://www.swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/download/326/257.

Murtadho, Nazhif Ali. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Preferen Dalam Pemberesan Proses Kepailitan.” Journal of Contemporary Law Studies 2, no. 3 (2024): 207–26. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/2.+2499+CE-1.pdf.

Muryati, Dewi Tuti, Dhian Septiandani, and Efy Yulistyowati. “Pengaturan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Terhadap Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Kreditor Separatis.” Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya 19, no. 1 (2017): 11. https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v19i1.682.

Nadhiroh, Anis Nur. “Tanggung Jawab Kurator Terhadap Hak Pekerja.” Notaire 2, no. 3 (2019): 297. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v2i3.16237.

Nazhifah, Naurah Afra, Ani Yumarni, and J.jopie Gilalo. 2019. “KAJIAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 310 K/PDT.SUS-KPPU/2017 TENTANG KETERLAMBATAN PEMBERITAHUAN PENGAMBILALIHAN SAHAM PERUSAHAAN ASING”. JURNAL HUKUM DE’RECHTSSTAAT 5 (2):93-104. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v5i2.1962. Nola, Luthvi Febryka. “Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 67/PUU-XI/2013 Terkait Kedudukan Upah Pekerja Dalam Kepailitan.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 10, no. 2 (2020): 152. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/1348-3840-1-PB.pdf.

Sabir, Muhammad, and Rifka Tunnisa. “Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Transaksi Perbankan (Studi Komparatif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam).” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 1 (2020): 80–97. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/14284-Article Text-37281-1-10-20200620.pdf.

Saija, Ronald, Iming Maknaan Tesalonika, Herman Bakir, Hukum Universitas Pattimura, and Hukum Universitas Djuanda. “Implikasi Ambiguitas Kreditur Separatis Dan Kurator Dalam Pembagian Boedel Debitor Pailit Menurut Perspektif Philosophy.” Pattimura Legal Journal 3, no. 2 (2024): 97–115. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/15556-Article Text-89941-1-10-20241110.pdf.

Saputra, Imran Eka. “Kedudukan Hukum Kreditor Preferen Pajak Dan Kreditor Preferen Buruh Dalam Proses Kepailitan.” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 23, no. 2 (2020): 155–66. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i2.44.

Sari, Arumi Riezky, and Iwan Erar Joesoef. “Peran Kurator Dalam Penanganan Kepailitian: Studi Lambatnya Pelaksanaan Putusan Kepailitan.” National Conference on Law Studies: Legal Development Towars A Digital Society Era, 2020, 978–79. https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/ncols/article/download/1453/932.

Silalahi, Udin. “Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Atas Hak Jaminan Dalam Proses Kepailitan.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 1 (2020): 35. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.35-47.

Sinaga, Syamsudin M. Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Tatanusa, 2012.

Subekti, R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata : Burgelijk Wetboek. Edited by R. Tjitrosudibio. Cet. 37. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2006. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=586814.

Syamsudin, Sulaiman, Ma’ruf Hafidz, and Hamza Baharuddin. “Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Harta Pailit.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS) 2, no. 3 (2021): 1368–79. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/441-Article Text-1906-1-10-20210322.pdf.

Tarigan, Arihta Esther, and Syafrida Syafrida. “Urutan Kreditur Yang Didahulukan Dalam Pelunasan Piutang Pada Perkara Kepailitan.” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 8, no. 2 (2021): 615–28. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v8i2.20363.

Usman, Rachmadi. Dimensi Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2004.

UUNo37. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentangkepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Database Peraturan Bpk Ri, 2004, 55. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/40784.

Widiyaningrum, Wahyu, and Iwan Erar Joesoef. “Penerapan Asas Actio Paulina Kepailitan Dan Perlindungan Hukumnya Terhadap Pembeli Yang Beritikad Baik.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2024): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2023.v8.i1.p57-74.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-23

How to Cite

Siregar, D. (2025). Separatist Creditors’ Rights In Handling Bankruptcy Assets. DE’RECHTSSTAAT, 11(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i1.17098

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.