The Challenges of Teaching Reading Using the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30997/jtm.v9i2.21453Keywords:
Reading Comprehension, CIRC, Cooperative Learning, Language Teaching, ChallengeAbstract
Reading is one of the most fundamental language skills that students must master to succeed in education and beyond. Yet, teaching reading in formal education often encounters multiple obstacles, ranging from low student motivation to the dominance of teacher-centered approaches. To address these issues, Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC), a cooperative learning model that integrates reading and writing, has been widely introduced and tested. This article investigates the challenges faced by teachers in applying the CIRC method in the teaching of reading comprehension at MTs Negeri 4 Kediri, Indonesia. Using a qualitative descriptive design, the study collected data through observations, interviews, and documentation with teachers, students, and the school principal. The findings indicate that while CIRC enhances student engagement, collaboration, and comprehension, it also poses challenges such as time management, unequal participation among students, and adaptability issues during remote or pandemic learning. This paper discusses these challenges in light of previous research, theories of cooperative learning, and broader educational implications, while suggesting strategies for teachers and institutions to optimize the use of CIRC in diverse contexts.
References
Ariawan, V. A. N., Utami, N. T., & Rahman, R. (2018). Peningkatan keterampilan membaca pemahaman siswa sekolah dasar melalui implementasi model CIRC berbantuan media cetak. Al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Primary Education, 1(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-aulad.v1i2.3529
Awatik, A. (2020). Pembelajaran dengan Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) dalam meningkatkan kemampuan menemukan pokok pikiran. Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(02), 56. https://doi.org/10.30742/tpd.v1i02.813
Bushra Saeed, B., & Gull, M. (2023). Effect of cooperative learning on elementary students’ reading comprehension in English. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(3), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-III)30
Cole, N. S. (1990). Conceptions of educational achievement. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 2–7.
Durukan, E. (2011). Effects of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) technique on reading–writing skills. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(1), 102–109.
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11.
Filderman, M. J., Austin, C. R., Boucher, A. N., O’Donnell, K., & Swanson, E. A. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of reading comprehension interventions on struggling readers. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 163–184.
Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (Eds.). (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harida, E. S. (2023). Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition-based FCL model for teaching English paragraphs. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2805(1), 090042. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0123456
Hakim, M. A. R., Amrulin, P. K., Zasrianita, F., & Kurniawan, Y. S. (2023). Implication of CIRC technique on English reading comprehension for MA students. Journal of English Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 45–53.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Publishing.
Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2015). Ragam model pembelajaran untuk peningkatan profesionalitas guru. Jakarta: Kata Pena.
Liani, N., Hermawan, R., & Riyadi, A. R. (2018). Penerapan metode Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan membaca pemahaman siswa kelas IV. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.33658/jl.v14i2.115
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nurhidayah, I., Mulyasari, E., & Robandi, B. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe pemahaman. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Oktafiani, W., Irdamurni, & Damri. (2018). Efektivitas model pembelajaran Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan membaca pemahaman anak disleksia. UNES Journal of Education Sciences, 2(1).
Rahmi, Y., & Marnola, I. (2020). Implementasi pendekatan kooperatif tipe CIRC dalam pembelajaran membaca pemahaman. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(3), 662–672. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i3.406
Remache Carrillo, N. M., Pilco Labre, M. G., & Yanez Valle, V. V. (2019). The effects of cooperative learning on reading comprehension. Investigación & Creatividad, 3(3.1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.33262/exploradordigital.v3i3.1.875
Safitri, D. A., & Ngaisah, S. (2018). Pengaruh metode CIRC (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition) terhadap kemampuan membaca pemahaman siswa pada materi cerita. Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(1), 75–84.
Shoimin, A. (2014). Model pembelajaran inovatif dalam kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZ Media.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. M. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 177–198). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students’ achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 321–351. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032002321
Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.2307/747701
Stevens, R. J., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1991). The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea identification. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 8–16.
Sunarti, S. (2021). Pembelajaran membaca pemahaman di sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Penerbit NEM.
Vaughn, S., Chard, D. J., Bryant, D. P., Coleman, M., Tyler, B. J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Kouzekanani, K. (2000). Fluency and comprehension interventions for third-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100603
What Works Clearinghouse (2010). Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC): Intervention report. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_circ_083110.pdf
What Works Clearinghouse (2012). Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC): Updated intervention report. Washington, DC: Institute of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_circ_062612.pdf
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
Yulia, N., & Ilham, F. (2019). The effectiveness of CIRC in improving students’ motivation and teamwork. International Journal of Language Teaching, 5(2), 88–97.
Zarei, A. A. (2012). The effects of STAD and CIRC on L2 reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Frontiers in Language Teaching, 3(1), 161–170.
Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2010). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1003–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.274
Zulfikar, T., & Putra, A. (2020). Cooperative learning in Indonesian classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Asian Journal of Education, 41(1), 55–70.
Zurita, M. (2015). Cooperative learning strategies and reading comprehension: A classroom action research. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(27), 112–119.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tenika Illananingtyas, Zulkhoirian Syahri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Tadbir Muwahhid agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Tadbir Muwahhid.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Tadbir Muwahhid.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
