Studi pendahuluan tentang persepsi keadilan terhadap prosedur dan tahapan hukum acara pada kasus kekerasan seksual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30997/jsh.v15i2.12817Keywords:
perception of justice, stages of procedural law, sexual violenceAbstract
Standar keadilan seringkali dijadikan tolak ukur keberhasilan penerapan hukum yang ada di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggali perspektif-perspektif yang muncul mengenai tahapan hukum acara dalam kasus kekerasan seksual di Kota Malang yang dilakukan pihak-pihak terkait dengan tahapan hukum acara dalam proses hukum tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan fenomenologi dengan metode pengumpulan data wawancara mendalam. Subyek penelitian ini adalah dosen Fakultas Hukum, penyidik, pengacara, dan aktivis pendamping kekerasan terhadap perempuan yang berafiliasi dengan lembaga swadaya masyarakat. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat tiga permasalahan yang muncul mengenai tahapan hukum acara dalam kasus kekerasan seksual terhadap perempuan, yaitu: permasalahan mengenai kecukupan alat bukti, ketidakmampuan hukum untuk kepentingan korban, dan potensi inkonsistensi antara proses penyidikan dan proses hukum. hasil penyidikan terhadap pelaku pemerkosaan.
References
Beech, A.R. (2010) ‘Sexual offenders’ in J.M. Brown and E.A. Campbell (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology, pp. 102–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) 'Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology'. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2), 77-101
Brown, J. (2012). Psychological perspectives on sexual violence; generating a general theory. In J. M. Brown, & S. L. Walklate (Eds.), Handbook on sexual violence (1. publ. ed., pp. 156-180). London [u.a.]: Routledge.
Campbell, B. A., Menaker, T. A., & King, W. R. (2015). The determination of victim credibility by adult and juvenile sexual assault investigators. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 29- 39. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.12.001
Ekandari, Mustaqfirin, & Faturochman. (2001). Perkosaan, Dampak, Dan Alternatif Penyembuhannya. Jurnal Psikologi, 1, 1–18.
Faturochman. (2002). Keadilan Perspektif Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Unit Penerbitan Fakultas Psikologi UGM dengan Pustaka Pelajar
Festinger L. A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations. 1954;7(2):117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
Follingstad, D. R., Li, C. R., Chahal, J. K., & Renzetti, C. M. (2020). Students’ perceptions of justice: Application of sanctions, guilt, and responsibility in campus sexual assault cases. Journal of Family Violence, doi:10.1007/s10896-020-00129-5
Greeson, M. R., Campbell, R., & Fehler-Cabral, G. (2014). Cold or caring? adolescent sexual assault victims' perceptions of their interactions with the police. Violence and Victims, 29(4), 636-651. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00039
Hamby, S. (2008). The path of helpseeking: Perceptions of law enforcement among american indian victims of sexual assault. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 36(1), 89-104. doi:10.1080/10852350802022340
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. (2020). Ketiadaan kesepakatan (consent) adalah dasar kekerasan seksual. https://icjr.or.id/ketiadaan-kesepakatan-consent-adalah-dasar-kekerasan-seksual/
Kappler, K. E. (2012). Theoretical framework: Sexual violence in the frame of everyday life. In K. E. Kappler (Ed.), Living with paradoxes: Victims of sexual violence and their conduct of everyday life (pp. 1-47). Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Kebbell, M., Alison, L., Hurren, E., & Mazerolle, P. (2010). How do sex offenders think the police should interview to elicit confessions from sex offenders? Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(7), 567-584. doi:10.1080/10683160902971055
Kemshall, H., Dominey, J., & Hilder, S. (2012). Public disclosure: Sex offenders' perceptions of the pilot scheme in england. compliance, legitimacy and living a “Good life”. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(3), 311-324. doi:10.1080/13552600.2011.603062
Koss, M. P. (1993). Detecting the Scope of Rape: A Review of Prevalence Research Methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626093008002004
La Kahija, YF. (2017). Penelitian Fenomenologis : Jalan memahami pengalaman hidup. Yogyakarta Kanisius.
McGlynn, C., & Westmarland, N. (2019). Kaleidoscopic justice: Sexual violence and victim-survivors' perceptions of justice. Social & Legal Studies, 28(2), 179-201. doi:10.1177/0964663918761200
Poerwandari, E. K. (2009). Pendekatan Kualitatif untuk Perilaku Manusia. Depok: Lembaga Pengembangan Sarana Pengukuran dan Pendidikan Psikologi (LPSP3) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.
Powell, M., & Cauchi, R. (2013). Victims’ perceptions of a new model of sexual assault investigation adopted by victoria police. Police Practice & Research, 14(3), 228-241. doi:10.1080/15614263.2011.641376
Pratasis, S. O. (2014). Implementasi teori keadilan komutatif terhadap pelaku pemerkosaan menurut pasal 285 kuhp. Lex Et Societatis, Retrieved from https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=ejournunsrat::820fbe197acfcca8e4322ee1f9a9c055
Slamet, S. (2015). Politik hukum pidana dalam kejahatan perkosaan. Yustisia, 4(2) doi:10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8666
Syafioedin, M. H., & Faturochman. (2001). Hukuman bagi pemerkosa & perlindungan bagi korban . In M. Darwin, & Tukiran (Eds.), Menggugat budaya patriarki (pp. 103-132). Yogyakarta: PPK UGM & Ford Foundation.
Syamsudin, M. (2014). Keadilan Prosedural Dan Substantif Dalam Putusan Sengketa Tanah Magersari. Jurnal Yudisial, 7(1), 18–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v7i1.91
Thibaut, I., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541- 566
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X
Wood, J. V. (1996). What is social comparison and how should we study it? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(5), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts must understand and agree to copyright the manuscript of the article was transferred to OJS Djuanda University. All rights reserved. The copyright release statement for the Journal of Social Humanities is set out in the Agreement Transfer of Copyright. This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) version 4.0 where Author and Readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format , as well as mixing, modifying and building materials for any purpose, but they must provide appropriate credit (citing articles or content), provides a link to the license, and indicates when changes have been made. If you mix, modify, or develop, the materials you have to distribute your contributions are under the same license as the originals.
