Mengatur Media Ramah Anak: Peran Konsumsi Media untuk Anak di Indonesia

Authors

  • Hanna Nurhaqiqi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Farikha Rachmawati Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jk.v11i2.13751

Keywords:

Child-friendly media, Regulation, Gadget, uses and gratification

Abstract

The media industry in Indonesia is experiencing rapid growth, along with an increasing number of audiences from various groups, including children and parents. Children, as part of the audience, have different characteristics from other age groups. Providing child-friendly media is crucial. This study aims to examine the perceptions and views of media activists and parents regarding the existence and quality of child-friendly media in Indonesia. The method used in this study was a qualitative approach with in-depth interviews with eight respondents, consisting of four media activists and four parents. Data analysis was conducted using the perspective of George Gerbner's Uses and Gratification Theory, as well as the Media Regulation theory of Sonia Livingstone and Peter Lunt. The results show that both media activists and parents believe that child-friendly media in Indonesia is currently still not optimal in meeting children's needs and interests. Available content is considered limited, less relevant to current developments, and does not fully support educational aspects or healthy entertainment for children. These findings emphasize the importance of collaboration between the media, government, and society to create stricter regulations and encourage the production of higher-quality content that is appropriate to the needs of children in today's digital era.

References

Bridle, J. (2017). Something is wrong on the internet. Https://Medium.Com/@jamesbridle/Something-Is-Wrong-on-the-Internet-C39c471271d2.

Bridle, J. (2018). The nightmare videos of childrens’ YouTube — and what’s wrong with the internet today. Https://Www.Youtube.Com/Watch?V=v9EKV2nSU8w.

Dixon, M. (2020). Media Theory for A Level. Routledge.

Franqueira, V. N. L., Annor, J. A., & Kafali, O. (2022). Age Appropriate Design: Assessment of TikTok, Twitch, and YouTube Kids. http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02638

FTC. (2019). Google and YouTube Will Pay Record $170 Million for Alleged Violations of Children’s Privacy Law. Https://Www.Ftc.Gov/News-Events/News/Press-Releases/2019/09/Google-Youtube-Will-Pay-Record-170-Million-Alleged-Violations-Childrens-Privacy-Law.

Harrison, E., & McTavish, M. (2018). ‘i’Babies: Infants’ and toddlers’ emergent language and literacy in a digital culture of iDevices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 18(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798416653175

Hidayat, D. N. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian dalam Sebuah “Multi-Paradigm Science.”

Ishikawa, A., Bollis, E., & Avila, S. (2019). Combating the Elsagate phenomenon: Deep learning architectures for disturbing cartoons. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.08910

Jempson, M. (1999). Developing Child-Friendly Media.

Kriyantono, R. (2014). Teori Public Relations Perspektif Barat Dan Lokal Aplikasi Penelitian Dan Praktik. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Lange, P. G. (2014). Kids on YouTube : Technical Identities and Digital Literacies.

Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1994). Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate.

Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Johnny, S. (2014). Matthew Miles, Michael Hberman, Johnny Sdana - Qualitative Data Analysis_ A Methods Sourcebook-Sage. SAGE.Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, D., & Solatun. (2013). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Neumann, M. M., & Herodotou, C. (2020). Evaluating YouTube videos for young children. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4459–4475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10183-7

Salsabilla, A., Salsabilla Maharani, A., Darmawan, M., & Wardana, K. (2023). ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal) Youtube Kids: Solusi Mengurangi Pengaruh Negatif Pada Youtube Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. 7(1).

Simanjuntak, M., Putri, M. K. N., Yuliati, L. N., Muflikhati, I., Retnaningsih, R., & Johan, I. R. (2023). Explaining Children on Youtube: The Case of Indonesian Subscriber Behavioral Intention on Kidz Youtube Channel. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 16(2), 188–198.

Siregar, M. F., Laksmi, S., & Berseri, L. (2012). Memetakan Kebijakan Media di Indonesia Oleh Yanuar Nugroho Riset kerjasama antara Didukung oleh. www.fostrom.com

Swastiningrum, I. (2022). Jebakan Elsagate: Tontonan Anak-Anak yang Tidak Ramah Anak. Https://Www.Remotivi.or.Id/Headline/Konsep-Dan-Isu/777.

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2011). Mass Media Research: An Introduction.

Bridle, J. (2017). Something is wrong on the internet. https://medium.com/@jamesbridle/something-is-wrong-on-the-internet-c39c471271d2

Franqueira, V. N. L., Annor, J. A., & Kafali, O. (2022). Age Appropriate Design: Assessment of TikTok, Twitch, and YouTube Kids. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02638

Livingstone, S., & Byrne, J. (2015). Challenges of parental responsibility in a global perspective: The case of children’s digital privacy. Media@LSE Working Paper. https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/projects/parental-responsibility/Report.pdf

Neumann, M. M., & Herodotou, C. (2020). Evaluating YouTube videos for young children. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4459–4475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10183-7

Ofcom. (2022). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report 2022. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/childrens/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2022

Swastiningrum, I. (2022). Jebakan Elsagate: Tontonan anak-anak yang tidak ramah anak. https://www.remotivi.or.id/headline/konsep-dan-isu/777

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17

How to Cite

Nurhaqiqi, H., & Rachmawati, F. (2025). Mengatur Media Ramah Anak: Peran Konsumsi Media untuk Anak di Indonesia. JURNAL KOMUNIKATIO, 11(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.30997/jk.v11i2.13751